Dad: Difference between revisions
imported>Dotclub Created page with "== Lyrics == <pre> If a syncategorematic expression such as "nothing is nothing" is to mean something deep, the first "nothing" has to be analogous to a "no" of the "no" when "no way" is "be". Whenever two universal negative signs are placed together in some expression, the first is equivalent to its contrary, the second to its contradiction. Concerning myself is what "nothing" is "nothing" if we refer to the rule above. We get "something is nothing" and that's plainly..." |
imported>Dotclub No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Lyrics == | == Lyrics == | ||
{{Lyrics| | |||
If a syncategorematic expression such as "nothing is nothing" is to mean something deep, the first "nothing" has to be analogous to a "no" of the "no" when "no way" is "be". Whenever two universal negative signs are placed together in some expression, the first is equivalent to its contrary, the second to its contradiction. | If a syncategorematic expression such as "nothing is nothing" is to mean something deep, the first "nothing" has to be analogous to a "no" of the "no" when "no way" is "be". Whenever two universal negative signs are placed together in some expression, the first is equivalent to its contrary, the second to its contradiction. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Chronology == | == Chronology == | ||
* | * {{RLink|Hazel}} | ||
== Interpretations == | == Interpretations == | ||
== | == References == | ||
[[Category:Songs]] | [[Category:Songs]] | ||
Revision as of 03:04, 7 January 2023
Lyrics
{{Lyrics| If a syncategorematic expression such as "nothing is nothing" is to mean something deep, the first "nothing" has to be analogous to a "no" of the "no" when "no way" is "be". Whenever two universal negative signs are placed together in some expression, the first is equivalent to its contrary, the second to its contradiction.
Concerning myself is what "nothing" is "nothing" if we refer to the rule above. We get "something is nothing" and that's plainly false so "nothing is nothing" is ? true. Because the first "nothing" means anything you please. Because the first "nothing" means anything you please.
This closely follows the method of sane and solid mingling the nominal with the quantificational. If we are rigorous and logically normal, the conclusions we reach will be sensational.
